The Worker Bee: Committed or Alienated?

TopicEmployee SatisfactionStrategic HR 

Publication: Research and Practice in Human Resource Management           
ArticleHRM: A Contributor to Employee Alienation.
Author: G.R. Tonks, L.G. Nelson

Featured by: Sarah Bowen

Bees Alienated employees are typified by
powerlessness, purposelessness, loneliness and self-estrangement. But what
causes these symptoms of alienation? Has Human Resource Management (HRM)
contributed to the increase in alienated, less-committed employees?
  Tonks and Nelson suggest multiple
variables play a role in the increased existence of alienation in the
workplace. Commitment to an organization declines when a company downsizes or
implements a hiring freeze. Sometimes implementing cost-reducing technology can
generate lower levels of employee commitment. Casual (or part-time) workers may
feel inferior compared to full-time workers in both benefits and value.
  A deficit in employee training and the
escalated use of out-sourcing fosters alienation as well.
  Each of these decreases employee trust
as workers fear for their jobs, cope with monotony, or sense inequitable
treatment.

How can HRM remedy the problem of
employee alienation by satisfying both its obligations to the organization and
employees?
  While research cannot
specifically answer this question, the model suggested requires that equal
benefit should be derived for both the organization and employees.
  Selection and training are two areas
proposed to reform in order to instill allegiance and transform organizational
culture. Selecting individuals that claim to be compatible with organizational
goals, promoting the organization’s beliefs in orientation, and restructuring
individual commitment are strategies to combat alienation and lack of
commitment.
  It is also important
for HRM to recognize that there is not a solitary remedy for combating employee
alienation; a diverse workforce requires individual solutions to such a
problem.
  Such solutions must be
sought to retain committed workers that produce results.

Tonks, G. R. & Nelson, L. G. (2008).
HRM: A Contributor to Employee Alienation?, Research and Practice in Human
Resource Management, 16(1), 1-17.

Any additional comments?

Topic: Employee Satisfaction, Surveys
Publication: Organizational Research Methods
ArticleA Comment on Employee Surveys.
Blogger: Rob Stilson

Untitled

This
study focused on the empirical examination of qualitative data from employee
surveys (e.g., open-ended questions).
 
The data set was a climate survey administered to 661 employees at a
large military organization, representing 23 different work areas.

Results
indicated that dissatisfied employees are more likely to provide comments in
the open-ended questions. Additionally, the more negative the comments were,
the longer they tended to be (as a quick aside, the longest I’ve seen is 3
pages commenting on everything from favoritism to adultery!). The authors
caution that open-ended comments tend towards the negative and people are less
likely to leave positive feedback in their comments.

There
were very little differences across demographics for those providing comments,
but that may be due to this particular population.
  It would be best to break out the results into subgroups
before assuming you have a good feel for your particular population.
 This may be especially true for large
companies employing both union and non-union employees.
 Overall, the ability to code qualitative
data and examine it empirically holds promise for the future of surveys and
what can be learned from their administration.

 Poncheri, R. M.,
Lindberg, J. T.,, Thompson L. F., and Surface, E. A., (2008).
A Comment on Employee SurveysOrganizational Research Methods 11(3), 614-630.