The need for ethical leadership in a global and capitalist world

Topic: Ethics, Leadership
Publication: Journal of Business Ethics (2010)
Article: Ethical leadership and global citizenship: Considerations for a just and sustainable future
Authors:  Deborah C. Poff
Reviewed By: Bobby Bullock

In a scathing critique of global capitalism and its effects on social, economic, and environmental justice, Poff (2010) lays out the argument for a realignment of values.  The problems associated with global capitalism, Poff argues, are numerous.  It threatens the environment in order to support the massive production of material goods, its problems are being used by charismatic extremists to win over the populations of developing nations, and the tenets of consumerism are distorting values towards possession of material goods over quality relationships and meaningful pursuits.  How, then, is the world to shift away from such a destructive course?  Through a massive realignment of values; championed by ethical leaders in business, education, and government.

According to Poff, we are at war with our current value system.  This system tells us: “that we are what we wear, what we drive, where we live and that what we own reflects what we are worth” (Poff, 2010, p. 10).  She warns that these values have been reflected in business, where recently leaders of organizations like Enron and Worldcom have chased the drive for profits to an excess that breaks with ethical norms.  Given that leadership to a large extent influences organizational culture and normative behavior, it is important that global leaders have a strong moral and ethical compass. 

Continue reading

Wanted: Company that is Well-Endowed, Reputable, and Ethical

Topic: Diversity, Recruiting, Staffing
Publication: Journal of Business Ethics

Article:
Social desirability response bias, gender, and factors influencing
organizational commitment: An international study.

Author: R.A. Bernardi, S.T. Guptill

Featured by: Lit Digger

International Given today’s economy, job openings are
drying up.
  However, for those
companies that DO have open positions to fill, recruiters may still find it
valuable to emphasize the aspects of the company that prospective applicants
are looking for.
  So what are some
key factors that job interviewees are seeking from potential employers?

Bernardi and Guptill (2009) examined the
following five factors that have been found in previous literature to predict
an employee’s willingness to stay committed to his/her company: the amount of
resources available from the company, fairness at work, the amount of care and
concern that management has for employees, the degree to which employees are
trusted by management, and the company’s reputation in the community.
  So are ALL of these also considered
important by people interviewing for a job?
  Well, the degree of importance may depend on the applicant’s
country of origin.

The authors found that respondents from
Ecuador, Columbia, and South Africa regarded the above five factors as
more important than respondents from Canada,
Hong Kong, Ireland, and the United States.
  They also took out the effects of gender and for social
desirability bias in their study, which was a notable contribution for ethics
research. 

Okay, so there were differences across
countries.
  But were there any
differences between males and females overall?
  Apparently, yes. 
Males didn’t rate any of the
five factors as highly as females – but at the same time, females were
generally more likely to answer in socially desirable ways than males.

So, maybe recruiters and interviewers
should keep in mind the country of origin and gender of each job candidate
while deciding what points to emphasize in their attempt to attract and retain
the best talent.
  Of course, these
findings do not generalize to
everyone,
but they still may provide some helpful hints along the way.

Bernardi,
R.A., Guptill, S.T., (2009). Social desirability response bias, gender, and
factors influencing organizational commitment: An international study. Journal
of Business Ethics, 81, 797-809.

Doing what Simon Says Regarding Safety

Topic: Stress, Wellness, Work Environments
Publication: Journal of Business Ethics
Article
Ethical climates and workplace safety behaviors: an empirical investigation.
Blogger: LitDigger

Cmon you can trust me How do you know that you won’t trip on
the telephone cord your coworker has stretched across the entryway of your
cubicle?
  You don’t (until the
inevitable happens).
  How do you
know whether or not workplace safety behaviors are actually practiced in your
organization?
  A study by
Parboteeah and Kapp (2008) says that the company’s ethical climate may provide
some clues.

Although the link between safety and
ethical climate hasn’t been examined to a great extent in previous literature,
Parboteeah and Kapp found some evidence suggesting this link may exist.
  The authors measured three different
types of ethical climate: egoist (Edgar acts ethically because he knows it’s in
his self-interest to do so), benevolent (Brittany acts ethically for the sake
of the common good), and principled (Pete acts ethically because of the laws,
rules, or professional codes surrounding him).

So which type of ethical climate did the
authors find to be associated with workplace safety?
  Of our three exemplified employees, we can aim our laser
pointer on Pete.
  Workplaces with
stronger
principled climates were
more likely to have lower injury rates and higher safety-enhancing behaviors
than workplaces with weaker principled climates.

Continue reading

Eeny-Meeny-Miny-MALE

Topic: Diversity
Publication: Journal of Business Ethics
Article: Are men always picked over women. The effects of employment equity directives on selection 

decisions.
Blogger: LitDigger

Eeny-meeny-miny-male OK.  Touchy
subject time.
  Ever thought about
the influence of the company’s employment equity directives?
  Research by Ng and Wiesner (2007) shows
that such directives may matter – especially if you’re a female applicant.

Who dislikes employment equity directives?  Is this because you are in the majority
group (ah hem, white, males) and you believe that you could lose out to someone
who less qualified because of their demographic background?
  Or are you in an underrepresented group
at work and feel like people see you in a position, not because of your skills,
but because of some demographic group you ‘belong’ to? Whichever side of the
coin you are on, let’s smash this right now: employment equity directives
don’t lead to less-qualified hires
(according to Ng and Wiesner).
 

Ng and Wiesner found that employment equity directives DO
help hire more people of underrepresented backgrounds, but only to the extent
that the new hires are
actually
qualified
for the job.

Continue reading