It’s the simple things in life…

Topic:  Research Methodology
Publication: Organizational Research Methods
ArticleGrounded Theory Method in management research: Users’ perspectives.
Blogger: James Grand

Its the simple things in life Qualitative research is the “art” of taking real-time narratives
or observations of human behavior/cognitions and systematically analyzing them
for themes, theories and indicators of what is occurring in a given
situation.
  In truth, such data is
collected all the time in organizations.
 
For example, employees are often asked to provide HR departments with
their goals for the year, provide feedback on new company policies, or
summarize the information they learned in a training seminar.
 

The real challenge for organizations (and researchers as well) is
figuring out how to use these observations to understand their employees and
affect meaningful changes just as they would had people provided survey data
(quantitative).
  Grounded Theory
Method (GTM, Glaser & Strauss, 1967) provides one such procedure.
  In brief, it involves a series of steps
in which the transcribed responses of individuals are reduced into increasingly
succinct bits of information until common, thematic keywords can be identified
that describe the nature of the phenomenon.

If this sounds like an onerous process, that’s because it is.  However, the most recent issue of Organizational Research Methods (2008,
Vol. 11, Iss. 3) presents an article by Fendt and Sachs that provides a number
of recommendations for flattening that learning curve a bit, including tips on
how to deal with nonverbal information, researcher bias, and making sense of
your data.
  While these are
difficult concepts to describe without a better understanding of GTM, such
information is invaluable to researchers and practitioners hoping to use
observational data without getting swamped in their analytic efforts.

And that simplicity is something we can all appreciate.

Fendt, J., & Sachs, W. (2008). Grounded Theory Method in management
research: Users’ perspectives.
Organizational
Research Methods, 1
1
(3), 430-455.

Glaser, B. G.,
& Strauss, A. L. (1967). The
discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research
. New
York: De Gruyter.

It’s The Simple Things In Life…

Topic: Research Methodology 
Publication: Organizational Research Methods
Article
Grounded Theory Method in management
research: Users’ perspectives.
 
   
  

Blogger: James Grand

Qualitative research is the “art” of taking real-time narratives
or observations of human behavior/cognitions and systematically analyzing them
for themes, theories and indicators of what is occurring in a given situation.
  In truth, such data is collected all
the time in organizations.
  For
example, employees are often asked to provide HR departments with their goals
for the year, provide feedback on new company policies, or summarize the
information they learned in a training seminar.
 

The real challenge for organizations (and researchers as well) is
figuring out how to use these observations to understand their employees and
affect meaningful changes just as they would had people provided survey data
(quantitative).
  Grounded Theory
Method (GTM, Glaser & Strauss, 1967) provides one such procedure.
  In brief, it involves a series of steps
in which the transcribed responses of individuals are reduced into increasingly
succinct bits of information until common, thematic keywords can be identified
that describe the nature of the phenomenon.

If this sounds like an onerous process, that’s because it is.  However, the most recent issue of Organizational Research Methods (2008,
Vol. 11, Iss. 3) presents an article by Fendt and Sachs that provides a number
of recommendations for flattening that learning curve a bit, including tips on
how to deal with nonverbal information, researcher bias, and making sense of
your data.
  While these are
difficult concepts to describe without a better understanding of GTM, such
information is invaluable to researchers and practitioners hoping to use
observational data without getting swamped in their analytic efforts.

And that simplicity is something we can all appreciate.

Fendt, J., & Sachs, W. (2008). Grounded Theory Method in management
research: Users’
perspectives.
Organizational Research
Methods, 1
1
(3), 430-455.

Any additional comments?

Topic: Employee Satisfaction, Surveys
Publication: Organizational Research Methods
ArticleA Comment on Employee Surveys.
Blogger: Rob Stilson

Untitled

This
study focused on the empirical examination of qualitative data from employee
surveys (e.g., open-ended questions).
 
The data set was a climate survey administered to 661 employees at a
large military organization, representing 23 different work areas.

Results
indicated that dissatisfied employees are more likely to provide comments in
the open-ended questions. Additionally, the more negative the comments were,
the longer they tended to be (as a quick aside, the longest I’ve seen is 3
pages commenting on everything from favoritism to adultery!). The authors
caution that open-ended comments tend towards the negative and people are less
likely to leave positive feedback in their comments.

There
were very little differences across demographics for those providing comments,
but that may be due to this particular population.
  It would be best to break out the results into subgroups
before assuming you have a good feel for your particular population.
 This may be especially true for large
companies employing both union and non-union employees.
 Overall, the ability to code qualitative
data and examine it empirically holds promise for the future of surveys and
what can be learned from their administration.

 Poncheri, R. M.,
Lindberg, J. T.,, Thompson L. F., and Surface, E. A., (2008).
A Comment on Employee SurveysOrganizational Research Methods 11(3), 614-630.