Outcomes of Leader Humor Depend on Gender
Gender stereotypes play a role in how costly or beneficial humor is at work, including potential implications on perceived leadership and performance.
Gender stereotypes play a role in how costly or beneficial humor is at work, including potential implications on perceived leadership and performance.
Leadership ratings may be heavily influenced by the type of people doing the ratings. What does this mean for the workplace?
Researchers find ways to increase perceptions of employee job commitment after a lengthy maternity leave.
When expectations are high and people face early setbacks, they are likely to feel embarrassed, make excuses, and withdraw from a project.
To relate with coworkers, we can empathize with their feelings or try to understand how they see the world. Which approach works better?
Researchers find that leadership change can result in increased team adaptability and recognition of errors.
Researchers study the types of inferences followers make about angry leaders in the workplace and provide recommendations for organizations.
Researchers explore two different ways of speaking up. One method is more effective for increasing perceptions of leadership. Does it work for everyone?
Employees performing degrading “dirty work” tend to disengage from the organization, but leadership emphasizing group goals may help keep them engaged.
Researchers study how feedback about leadership potential affects employee performance and ambition, and make recommendations for organizations.