How Human Resources Can Strategically Influence Organizations
Harvard Business Review discusses how a company’s top leadership can work together to improve personnel decisions and organizational performance.
Harvard Business Review discusses how a company’s top leadership can work together to improve personnel decisions and organizational performance.
Leaders can simultaneously balance the needs of employees and the needs of the company, leading to maximum organizational effectiveness.
Researchers find that leader effectiveness may be judged based on the racial demographics of the leader’s work group. How can organizations stop this?
Research reveals detrimental outcomes for leaders who express anger, including a reduction in organizational citizenship behavior.
Research identifies distinct benefits to employees who behave well at work. What does this mean for organizations that want to maximize productivity?
Research shows that overly narcissistic leaders may view themselves as central to the organization’s identity, with negative effects to follow.
Specific personality traits of leaders, including conscientiousness, extraversion, and emotional stability, are useful for predicting organizational success.
Besides for being the right thing to do, ethical leadership has distinct organizational advantages that lead to a more productive workplace.
Research explores how different leadership styles are associated with different emotional strategies. What are the implications?
Leaders oftentimes fail to practice what they preach. In the case of interpersonal justice hypocrisy, this can lead to increased employee turnover.