How Human Resources Can Strategically Influence Organizations
Harvard Business Review discusses how a company’s top leadership can work together to improve personnel decisions and organizational performance.
Harvard Business Review discusses how a company’s top leadership can work together to improve personnel decisions and organizational performance.
Leaders can simultaneously balance the needs of employees and the needs of the company, leading to maximum organizational effectiveness.
Researchers test three different diversity training strategies to find which one works best in lowering prejudice and workplace unfairness.
Uncertainty often leads to lack of job security and poor performance. How can organizational justice counter this?
Researchers discover that adaptability and job satisfaction are crucial components of workplace proactivity. Why is this the case?
Researchers find that leader effectiveness may be judged based on the racial demographics of the leader’s work group. How can organizations stop this?
Research reveals detrimental outcomes for leaders who express anger, including a reduction in organizational citizenship behavior.
Research identifies distinct benefits to employees who behave well at work. What does this mean for organizations that want to maximize productivity?
Why does it seem that some people have passion for work and others merely go through the motions? New research shows that people have two different mindsets about how to achieve passion for their jobs.
For some jobs, working from home is just not possible. This is especially true if you are an assembly line technician, postal worker, coal miner, or pirate. But in the new economy, many professions require little else but a computer and mouse. This is why telework—or working from home—is all the rage. But does it work? And is it good for employees?